need some help my FPS !!

Hi All !!! need some help who knows better than i
i download Highest Resolution Textures and now my fps is not good... how i get my fps back to 61-70
now fps is 20-50

AMD Athlon64 Processor 3500+, 1.0GB RAM,NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT 512 silent magic ....

or is my pc too powerless

Easiest thing would just be to uninstall the high res texture pack.

I'm sure there are othere ways to do it, I believe theres a cfg floating around for fps improvement....

Delete the materials folder.
Using a high fps config whilst having the hi res textures installed defeats the purpose of the hi res textures in the 1st place.

Using a high fps config whilst having the hi res textures installed defeats the purpose of the hi res textures in the 1st place.

That's what I was gonna say, you can use my fps enhancer, but it would be kinda silly, cuz textures would be useless.... just remove them.

thanks all!... i remove materials folder ... now work.. fps 61

sava wrote:thanks all!... i remove materials folder ... now work.. fps 61

You might want to look at a new video card with only 61-70 fps. I sometimes have trouble playing with 80-90 Fps.

wow. i thought i was doing well when i got mine up to 50!

lol i heard some player have 150-200 fps that must be nice :roll:

Yes nice!

sava wrote:lol i heard some player have 150-200 fps that must be nice :roll:

Nvidia 7600GT I've gotten 250+ on certain maps and even hit 300 before. I've heard of people with single 8600/8800 AVERAGING around 300-310+

cyber_clash wrote:

sava wrote:lol i heard some player have 150-200 fps that must be nice :roll:

Nvidia 7600GT I've gotten 250+ on certain maps and even hit 300 before. I've heard of people with single 8600/8800 AVERAGING around 300-310+

nice maybe someday i get my fps over 100

maybe defrag harddrive. Also update drivers....that might help

Ahaha, stop complaining. AVERAGING 30 on lockdown.

i was told the human eye can only see 30 fps. so what the big deal is ....i dunno?

MORPHIUS wrote:i was told the human eye can only see 30 fps. so what the big deal is ....i dunno?

its actualy 60, but for some reason I can see the difference from 60-120, so I cap my fps at 120.

I'm curious, if you have an LCD monitor with max 75 fps, isn't in-game fps showing anything over 75 fps actually wasted?

CellarDweller wrote:I'm curious, if you have an LCD monitor with max 75 fps, isn't in-game fps showing anything over 75 fps actually wasted?

If vsync isnt on you will get what is called "tearing" you will see horizontal line where the images dont seem to meet correctly.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_tearing

I find having Vsync on messes my mouse movement kind of makes it less responsive, anyone else get that? and know a cure?

keefy wrote:

CellarDweller wrote:I'm curious, if you have an LCD monitor with max 75 fps, isn't in-game fps showing anything over 75 fps actually wasted?

If vsync isnt on you will get what is called "tearing" you will see horizontal line where the images dont seem to meet correctly.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_tearing

i have BenQ 22" wide LCD. refresh rate 60 hz (game res=1680x1050 32 bit )

Briggs wrote:

MORPHIUS wrote:i was told the human eye can only see 30 fps. so what the big deal is ....i dunno?

its actualy 60, but for some reason I can see the difference from 60-120, so I cap my fps at 120.

there is no known limit to what fps the eye can see afaik

I'd like to see the study that determined it. Likely flawed or misleading like so many other inquiries.

I think its more a case of what framerate looks smooth rather than how many the eye can see.
It is believed that to a blue bottle fly lights seem to flicker where as to the human eye it looks constant, we are bothe seeing the same frequency (or frames) just our eyes are not abe to distinguish each individual pulse.

Walking Target wrote:I'd like to see the study that determined it. Likely flawed or misleading like so many other inquiries.

MeekMeekle dug up an interesting article on this exact subject........if I could only find it again.........something to do with the human eye using motion blur to compensate for RL fps, and since that same motion blur cannot be duplicated in games yet, that is why we see such differences between say 30 fps to 85 fps.

Maybe he still has it.

Ghost Dog_TSGK wrote: MeekMeekle dug up an interesting article on this exact subject..

http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_c ... ns_see.htm

very very interesting meek. now i need new equipment. i was so happy in my world were nothing over 30 fps mattered.