Ghost Dog_TSGK
2010-08-14 05:16:42
Ghost Dog_TSGK
2010-08-14 05:16:42
Freetux
2010-08-14 05:25:01
chickenmobile
2010-08-14 05:35:48
Nihlus
2010-08-14 07:55:37
Exactly. The only thing more useless would be if they made a version for men.chickenmobile wrote:Right... who would buy that? If your conscious about a low top just wear a different top!
chickenmobile
2010-08-14 12:03:57
Lol, I wouldn't be surprised if they would come up with that though. Those TV ads with stupid things you can buy are all crap. I once saw this one where a woman had a duster but it spun around. http://www.centurymail.com.au/products/ ... uster.html I was like wtf?Nihlus wrote:Do you like to party in your assless chaps, but can't wear them to work because your buttcheeks would be exposed? is wearing jeans under your assless chaps uncomfortable and irritating? NO worries! DatassSecretâ„¢ will take care of that!
Ghost Dog_TSGK
2010-08-14 21:58:57
Nihlus wrote:Exactly. The only thing more useless would be if they made a version for men.chickenmobile wrote:Right... who would buy that? If your conscious about a low top just wear a different top!
Do you like to party in your assless chaps, but can't wear them to work because your buttcheeks would be exposed? is wearing jeans under your assless chaps uncomfortable and irritating? NO worries! DatassSecretâ„¢ will take care of that!
provost
2010-08-16 23:19:34
Ghost Dog_TSGK
2010-08-17 01:15:41
chickenmobile
2010-08-17 11:36:36
Errr what? Now that can't be real!provost wrote:http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xcjb6r ... ous-n_news
Nihlus
2010-08-17 12:45:17