gas_mask
2008-09-06 10:58:16
plz discuss
-NOOB 1st DAY LOLOL HAHAH
gas_mask
2008-09-06 10:58:16
Briggs
2008-09-06 11:33:28
Charles
2008-09-06 13:44:49
shunnyboy
2008-09-25 02:06:34
Briggs
2008-09-25 02:16:08
k-osshunnyboy wrote:or rather the ppl that need pro to bhop ;)
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2008-09-25 02:17:27
gas_mask wrote:Personally i think CAL should start looking at this game as a whole. Thus CAL should appeal to everyone that plays this game. Thus CAL should have a CO OP league. With all 78 maps, and then CAL should have a Surfing League. THEN CAL should have a SHELLSHOCK league for those guys.
plz discuss
-NOOB 1st DAY LOLOL HAHAH
Paradox
2008-09-25 03:00:59
scott5245
2008-09-25 09:21:47
Paradox
2008-09-25 18:42:04
scott5245 wrote:ive always thought a cal free for all leage would be awesome
scott5245
2008-09-25 22:10:57
yah. it would be like who i best in a pub. it would be fun atleastParadox wrote:scott5245 wrote:ive always thought a cal free for all leage would be awesome
No idea how you would even determine match ups with this. Also determining seed would be one hell of a lot of work for the admin. The CAL sytem has no way of reporting such a thing in terms of which players are 1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc in a match or round. Also how you do would greatly depend on who else is in the match so there would be a huge randomess to it. In short its not really possible to run a statistically sound FFA league. It would be just like playing in a FFA pub.
The Argumentalizer
2008-09-25 22:48:20
phantom
2008-09-25 23:31:55
Paradox
2008-09-26 00:49:54
[EYE] Valar
2008-09-26 01:51:11
Paradox
2008-09-26 03:01:12
[EYE] Valar
2008-09-26 03:36:39
Walking Target
2008-09-26 03:42:51
You could not be more wrong on this point. The reason no Killbox, ctf, or co-op section exists[EYE] Valar wrote:...or a KB (or CO-OP, or CTF or wth ever) section on this forum they should understand that unspoken “code” that is part of HL2DM CAL society's mindset (or L33ts as it were) does not allow it. Many won't like hearing this because it says something about them.
[EYE] Valar
2008-09-26 03:59:32
Paradox
2008-09-26 04:01:23
[EYE] Valar
2008-09-26 04:07:38
Walking Target
2008-09-26 05:54:04
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2008-09-26 05:55:11
The Argumentalizer
2008-09-26 10:31:47
badinfluence
2008-09-26 18:01:41
old time no.7
2008-09-26 18:27:33
Walking Target
2008-09-26 19:58:33
Fearsome*
2008-09-26 22:37:53
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2008-09-27 01:39:52
Super Luigi
2008-09-27 02:13:57
I think its a good idea, but how would we have someone qualify as a semi-noob?{EE}chEmicalBurn wrote:i talked to Para about starting a "b" division for CAL, would be fun for semi-nOObs like me, i haven't been playing all that long and all though playing against really good clans in cal is good for me, i would enjoy playing in a b division for a season and see how it goes. I applied to be a CAL admin, but there arent really any spaces open. if somebody would like to join me in starting up this B division i would love to do it. i think it would help ppl like me get used to match play, and get used to strategy techniques. also it would be a nice place for new teams that havent played in CAL get into the style of play. i think CAL would be greatly surprized at how many new teams would be joining if this was available.
bahlk
2008-09-27 02:41:48
CellarDweller
2008-09-27 03:07:54
i accept your invitation sir. i'll put together an app for CAL over the weekend.{EE}chEmicalBurn wrote:i talked to Para about starting a "b" division for CAL, would be fun for semi-nOObs like me, i haven't been playing all that long and all though playing against really good clans in cal is good for me, i would enjoy playing in a b division for a season and see how it goes. I applied to be a CAL admin, but there arent really any spaces open. if somebody would like to join me in starting up this B division i would love to do it. i think it would help ppl like me get used to match play, and get used to strategy techniques. also it would be a nice place for new teams that havent played in CAL get into the style of play. i think CAL would be greatly surprized at how many new teams would be joining if this was available.
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2008-09-27 07:58:54
CellarDweller wrote:i accept your invitation sir. i'll put together an app for CAL over the weekend.{EE}chEmicalBurn wrote:i talked to Para about starting a "b" division for CAL, would be fun for semi-nOObs like me, i haven't been playing all that long and all though playing against really good clans in cal is good for me, i would enjoy playing in a b division for a season and see how it goes. I applied to be a CAL admin, but there arent really any spaces open. if somebody would like to join me in starting up this B division i would love to do it. i think it would help ppl like me get used to match play, and get used to strategy techniques. also it would be a nice place for new teams that havent played in CAL get into the style of play. i think CAL would be greatly surprized at how many new teams would be joining if this was available.
edit: are there some guidelines somewhere for applying for CAL admin??? i'm not seeing anything on the CAL site.
lead
2008-09-27 11:59:30
totally agree here and add...good players should be able to play on any style of map, not just the ones that suit their style of play; guess it comes down to personal preference in the end[GoTg] old time no.7 wrote: i agree there is an underlying attitude of players (in CAL or just in other servers) who dismiss the kill box as an aim only style of play, that is somehow inferior b/c there is less strategy and movement skill required.
on a semi-related note.
for us players who are semi sucky, want to play for only fun, and get contiuously stompped by other top teir playrs (cough pb) but still enjoy competing, but maybe want to compete without recieving a total asswhooping, can we get a scrub leauge going?
[EYE] Valar
2008-09-27 14:39:04
That is another myth. so many great KB players suck so bad on reg grav. is just how it is with some ppl. lazy asses like myself who never bothered learning bhopping doesn't mean are not "good" players. sorry mate but this is just wrong.lead wrote:...good players should be able to play on any style of map, not just the ones that suit their style of play
lead
2008-09-27 15:03:17
soooo.....that would just make them great at KB's and that's not dissin' anyone who plays KB's?; I also said its down to preference too Valar, though I obviously take your points on board. Btw i dont bhop either, though I admire ppl who can and have taken the time to learn; i do play KBs and low grav too and found it difficult to adjust (like skul shock etc) but ultimately fun which is what games are all about IMHO[EYE] Valar wrote:That is another myth. so many great KB players suck so bad on reg grav. is just how it is with some ppl. lazy asses like myself who never bothered learning bhopping doesn't mean are not "good" players. sorry mate but this is just wrong.lead wrote:...good players should be able to play on any style of map, not just the ones that suit their style of play
[EYE] Valar
2008-09-27 15:57:40
no. because ppl who play Killbox don't call themselves L33ts and diss others and that's what i was referring to. there is no alienation around KB.lead wrote:soooo.....that would just make them great at KB's and that's not dissin' anyone who plays KB's?t
Very true mate. and here's for hoping others will embrase this attitude as well.lead wrote:but ultimately fun which is what games are all about IMHO :
Paradox
2008-09-27 19:44:04
Ko-Tao
2008-09-28 04:28:18
Depends on the players... ive seen plenty of those types in killboxes, not to mention every other style of map / play.[EYE] Valar wrote:no. because ppl who play Killbox don't call themselves L33ts and diss others and that's what i was referring to. there is no alienation around KB.lead wrote:soooo.....that would just make them great at KB's and that's not dissin' anyone who plays KB's?t
Fearsome*
2008-09-28 07:28:20
PwNs3ttia
2008-09-29 09:39:47
Super Luigi
2008-09-29 17:10:24
In a way this is sorta true, I dont see as many new players as i did when i started playin this game =/PwNs3ttia wrote:real reason nothing new happens or changes: this game is not growing, there are and never will be any new players who have the will to deal with this community to become true compettitors. you can say what you want but this community hasn't had any growth for a long long while and I think we all know the reason for that.
badinfluence
2008-09-29 17:30:55
As have i.Ko-Tao wrote:Depends on the players... ive seen plenty of those types in killboxes, not to mention every other style of map / play.[EYE] Valar wrote:no. because ppl who play Killbox don't call themselves L33ts and diss others and that's what i was referring to. there is no alienation around KB.lead wrote:soooo.....that would just make them great at KB's and that's not dissin' anyone who plays KB's?t
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2008-09-29 18:59:17
PwNs3ttia wrote:real reason nothing new happens or changes: this game is not growing, there are and never will be any new players who have the will to deal with this community to become true compettitors. you can say what you want but this community hasn't had any growth for a long long while and I think we all know the reason for that.
Walking Target
2008-09-29 19:58:36
L2k
2008-09-29 20:03:48
ninojman
2008-09-29 20:21:46
True. And to Valar there are douche bags everywhere. Or 'L33ts' as you call them. some claim stock is the only way to play some claim low grav kb is.Fearsome* wrote:You get all types in all maps.
Because 35% of the community plays Killbox. I'd say 75% of the current Stock players started in Killbox and just moved there way over to stock. Making a killbox league would only speed this.Fearsome* wrote: The real issue I see is just a map. Why does everyone think that starting a killbox league will have some sort of positive effect.
lockdown is a stock map, There are plenty of different Killbox maps. Some use jump pads which Stock maps have yet to use at all. Jokes when you have plenty of people seriously willing to lend help and put in work to make it happen. The more admins we have the better. Valar put in work to get interest and you let it dry up. He is obviously still willing to get it to happen.Fearsome* wrote: Its kinda like me saying hey I am going to boot up a lockdown league where we play 8 different versions of lockdown. I am sure the popularity of lockdown would lend to some people joining that league but I don't think many people would call it a step forward for the game.
if you can really call that a 'Try' then it was an attempt to make it fail so you can say you tried it and don't have to worry about it.Fearsome* wrote: As we tried before I think the real deal is if enough killbox players would just participate in CAL and then a killbox map would end up in the rotation. But last time we tried that killbox players just did not show up or play. For which they cited alot of different reasons.
Super Luigi wrote:real reason nothing new happens or changes: this game is not growing, there are and never will be any new players who have the will to deal with this community to become true compettitors. you can say what you want but this community hasn't had any growth for a long long while and I think we all know the reason for that.
Then you should try to get the other 55% of the very active community in shell shock. They have a play made league which is shitty, and would jump on CAL. Shellshock is growing and growing fast. New players can jump in and own. Something that hl2dm has always lacked. Pubs are full 24/7 and doubling each day. Clans are starting everywhere.Fearsome* wrote:I am all about diverse game styles in CAL.
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2008-09-29 20:58:20
CellarDweller
2008-09-29 21:40:02
Paradox
2008-09-29 23:32:22
provost
2008-09-29 23:43:55
ninojman
2008-09-30 00:15:37
Like 15 admins have applied to help 5 of which would be good for helpers. 3 Others have offered to start Killbox. SS has the person who created the plug-in and user-made league, plus the various other players who are very active. Many of which have 100+ hours of hl2dm game play. None have been looked into. But rest assured that Fearsome thought about it and then thought it wasn't a good idea..conflict wrote:I've always been all about being positive and smiley but before thinking of:
expansion, lack of servers, regrouping people, opening new leagues, putting diff playstyles in CAL etc....
The main issue, and the hardest to solve, is to find people devoting time and
that are mature and able to admins.
and good luck with that.
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2008-09-30 00:38:32
ninojman wrote:Like 15 admins have applied to help 5 of which would be good for helpers. 3 Others have offered to start Killbox. SS has the person who created the plug-in and user-made league, plus the various other players who are very active. Many of which have 100+ hours of hl2dm game play. None have been looked into. But rest assured that Fearsome thought about it and then thought it wasn't a good idea..conflict wrote:I've always been all about being positive and smiley but before thinking of:
expansion, lack of servers, regrouping people, opening new leagues, putting diff playstyles in CAL etc....
The main issue, and the hardest to solve, is to find people devoting time and
that are mature and able to admins.
and good luck with that.
Shinigami
2008-09-30 00:58:08
shunnyboy
2008-09-30 01:19:58
provost
2008-09-30 01:23:24
Walking Target
2008-09-30 01:32:39
You could idle under alias and then only pm the necessary parties.I believe I am more than qualified, in time and knowledge to be a cal admin for this style, however is my dislike of getting trampled by T.U.A [the usual a-holes] that prevents me from visiting the IRC channel
Shinigami
2008-09-30 01:42:21
phantom
2008-09-30 16:23:11
badinfluence
2008-09-30 17:38:00
The thing is, you're still making people conform to you. They would still have to play stock maps in CAL. They are killbox players for a reason. They don't like stock maps.Fearsome* wrote: As we tried before I think the real deal is if enough killbox players would just participate in CAL and then a killbox map would end up in the rotation. But last time we tried that killbox players just did not show up or play. .
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2008-09-30 18:09:37
badinfluence
2008-09-30 18:18:50
lead
2008-09-30 20:06:01
Blasphemy
2008-09-30 20:18:40
i doubt that many teams would join their aren't enough people playing this game to be having diff division, unlike some other games like css that have open, intermediate, main, and invite.{EE}chEmicalBurn wrote:i talked to Para about starting a "b" division for CAL, would be fun for semi-nOObs like me, i haven't been playing all that long and all though playing against really good clans in cal is good for me, i would enjoy playing in a b division for a season and see how it goes. I applied to be a CAL admin, but there arent really any spaces open. if somebody would like to join me in starting up this B division i would love to do it. i think it would help ppl like me get used to match play, and get used to strategy techniques. also it would be a nice place for new teams that havent played in CAL get into the style of play. i think CAL would be greatly surprized at how many new teams would be joining if this was available.
Zman42
2008-09-30 21:20:23
Rachkir
2008-09-30 22:03:17
Walking Target
2008-09-30 22:42:56
L2k
2008-09-30 23:06:37
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2008-09-30 23:36:39
L2k
2008-10-01 00:34:50
Super Luigi
2008-10-01 00:57:35
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2008-10-01 01:17:53
well yes, that is one of the ways around the ip address issue, but there's only so much we can do.Super Luigi wrote:I live at two diff houses, so two diff ip's but u deffinetely can tell when im at one house with a 1000000000000000000000000 ping
Shinigami
2008-10-01 01:32:52
Fearsome*
2008-10-01 06:56:40
Fearsome*
2008-10-01 07:17:51
The competitive community can grow even if the game does not as noobs become better and are trained into competition. This is very possible and normal for a game. In fact in the late days of HLDM I would say it was really their hay day for competition almost everyone who played was competing in leagues and many attended LANs. If everyone here just went out and found 1 willing player and helped get them into the swing of things we would see tremendous growth.PwNs3ttia wrote:real reason nothing new happens or changes: this game is not growing, there are and never will be any new players who have the will to deal with this community to become true compettitors. you can say what you want but this community hasn't had any growth for a long long while and I think we all know the reason for that.
Walking Target
2008-10-01 07:24:46
Super Luigi
2008-10-01 07:54:56
QFTWalking Target wrote:Growing or not we are all still here, numbers are about the same as they were before TF2 came out, even though many predicted TF2 would mean HL2DM faded to nothing.
shunnyboy
2008-10-01 08:17:12
ninojman
2008-10-02 00:39:44
IRC was made for people running 56k's so it uses the least amount of bandwidth.shunnyboy wrote:whats so good about irc? ... steam is shit but still at least the chat is in game? imo msn is best
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2008-10-02 01:02:57
ninojman wrote:
Everyone else stop saying B division Lmao you sound so noob. Just look at any other league in cal if you are wondering how Cal-o/im/m/I/p work.
Again like with other leagues in cal, if one team is good or deserves to be inthe higher division the admins can just place them there.
Super Luigi
2008-10-02 01:08:10
Good Idea, like look at the teaqms records from this season.{EE}chEmicalBurn wrote:WT brought up a good point somewhere in this post about the top team from the B division moving up to the A and vice versa, i think that's a really good idea.
shunnyboy
2008-10-02 02:09:07
Paradox
2008-10-02 02:49:14
Fearsome* wrote:I think I have done a decent job with my judgment though only failed twice .....
badinfluence
2008-10-02 04:34:06
ninojman wrote:shunnyboy wrote: Fearsome all cal did was add one killbox map to 1v1. That isn't gonna get any hardcore killbox play to join.
lead
2008-10-02 13:42:50
Agree here m8 most ppl if they're honest don't want to be pwnd constantly anyway, I think it would provide encouragement to people who aren't at the top of their game yet . Would this not be a great opportunity to promote the game and lessen the leet image that seems to pervade sometimes (not saying that everyone is like that as there are some very helpful players at the top of their game) cue big straw{EE}chEmicalBurn wrote:ninojman wrote:
Everyone else stop saying B division Lmao you sound so noob. Just look at any other league in cal if you are wondering how Cal-o/im/m/I/p work.
Again like with other leagues in cal, if one team is good or deserves to be inthe higher division the admins can just place them there.
how does saying "B" division sound noob, i dont understand that comment, please explain.
WT brought up a good point somewhere in this post about the top team from the B division moving up to the A and vice versa, i think that's a really good idea.
ninojman
2008-10-02 16:41:38
{EE}chEmicalBurn wrote:ninojman wrote:
Everyone else stop saying B division Lmao you sound so noob. Just look at any other league in cal if you are wondering how Cal-o/im/m/I/p work.
Again like with other leagues in cal, if one team is good or deserves to be inthe higher division the admins can just place them there.
how does saying "B" division sound noob, i dont understand that comment, please explain.
WT brought up a good point somewhere in this post about the top team from the B division moving up to the A and vice versa, i think that's a really good idea.
Paradox
2008-10-02 18:06:38
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2008-10-02 19:32:07
Shinigami
2008-10-02 19:41:48
CellarDweller
2008-10-02 19:47:03
Zman42
2008-10-02 19:52:05
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2008-10-02 20:07:25
Zman42 wrote:I would assume teams couldnt be moved up mid season without causing lots of complications. It would probably have to be somewhat of an honor system...i mean if a whole bunch of pros really want to go beat up on new players to get some satisfaction thats pretty weak.....
L2k
2008-10-02 20:19:09
I kind of like the way this looks but think there needs to be a third division, for totally new players, as a new player would still get stomped in this open division.ninojman wrote:{EE}chEmicalBurn wrote:ninojman wrote:
Everyone else stop saying B division Lmao you sound so noob. Just look at any other league in cal if you are wondering how Cal-o/im/m/I/p work.
Again like with other leagues in cal, if one team is good or deserves to be inthe higher division the admins can just place them there.
how does saying "B" division sound noob, i dont understand that comment, please explain.
WT brought up a good point somewhere in this post about the top team from the B division moving up to the A and vice versa, i think that's a really good idea.
"Just look at any other league in cal if you are wondering how Cal-o/im/m/I/p work."
it wouldn't be a 'b' division the teams that played in the top 10 would move up to Cal-m
the 'B' division would be the bottom level where new teams join, and if they don't make the top 4 or so, stay for the next season.
oh and KB and SS would be better entry level for css players
I brought this issue up, before the season, in late july and every season in sta.
1v1 would look like this
Cal - Main
Agim "Poor_Billy" Tepothy
Jorge "Infusion" Mier
Shaun "Ko-Tao" Rattray
William "Da11aS" Burwell
Carter "That guy" D'Arcy
Timmy "CoNfuSed" McCarthy
Jesse "ninojman" Bell
Zephyr "Zman.flaS" Cady
Cal - Open
Rudolph "Fearsome*" Sloup
L "Divinity" G
Steve " Punk" Guyer
Jarrett "Herbalizer" Marrone
jay "2snails." thomas
Richard "Chard" Hoffart
Sean "sype" Simmons
Kyle "Kyle^" Childress
Garrett "Gmpianoman" M
Ricky "Overkill" Hall
andrew "old time no.7" trexler
Ross "WT" Ward
Sean "BuckyKatt" Woods
Adam "zelmaN" Zelmanowicz
Zman42
2008-10-02 20:24:05
L2k
2008-10-02 20:30:34
while it seems like a joke, I think he came up with that based on the standard that you have to have previously finished top 8 in the prior season. Considering it was a close battle with ties for the final 8th spot, I think the open would still be a pretty highly competitive division.Zman42 wrote:fearsome in open division has got to be a joke...
CellarDweller
2008-10-02 22:27:55
ninojman
2008-10-02 22:56:11
Check out the news From Dods Cal-o or Css Cal-oCellarDweller wrote:nino, when we have discussed this in the past... i always became confused about 'move ups' and 'move downs' between divisions.
as i recall, you told me the move ups/downs can happen during the ongoing season. but how does that affect the schedule/rankings for the divisions affected???
Say a new to cal team joins an open division and rapes from the get go. if they are moved up to the main division 3 weeks into the season, arent they going to be automatically handicapped in the rankings with no playoff potential at all? that always confused me. and maybe i misunderstood what you were telling me about move ups/downs.
ninojman
2008-10-02 23:01:31
This is the problem everyone is having with the idea, By thinking of it as a "B" or sub par division. It is Open or base level. And when you prove you are tops of the division you move up to the next level.CellarDweller wrote:it is a bit of a logistical nightmare. standardizing the ratings/skill level for separate divisions. lets use team v for an example. a montage of different players from different clans entered their first cal season. team v had a 2v2 and 4v4 team with a fairly robust roster of players that fluctuated slightly throughout the season. but not every player rostered actually played a match. and some team v members have scattered and may be on different teams next season.
so, when we are discussing "new" to cal... what are we really saying? is team v now considered cal experienced regardless of who they roster next season? the team v roster (and other clans too) will have different players rostered from season to season. it really comes down to individual players doesn't it? and if so, what about a cal team that rosters half experienced cal players and half "new" players?
with team v, i didn't play 1v1 and didnt sign up for 1v1. if i sign up for cal 1v1 next season, am i "new" and destined to the "open" division?
with team v, i was rostered for 2v2 but played zero cal matches. how would that be assessed?
with team v, i was rostered for 4v4 and played only one cal match all season. how would that be assessed?
i dont have the answers, but im throwing these things out for more discussion. if the "assessment" is left strictly in the hands of admins... the admins are going to get hammered even more. yet, i have no clue how a points system could be instituted to determine player assessments.
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2008-10-02 23:43:56
Uncle Rico
2008-10-02 23:50:11
[EYE] Valar
2008-10-03 01:27:26
Walking Target
2008-10-03 01:35:00
Agree wholeheartedly.1. It's almost painfull to get 8 people in different timezones, with different schedules and different resposbility levels together at the same time. Why not switch down to a 3v3 league? Two less players makes for better play on most of the maps we use for 4v4. 4v4 has always seemed like a complete clusterfuck on most maps we play anyway and it's more difficult finding new maps that accommodate 4v4 play.
I was saying the same thing in IRC the other night actually. Poor Billy, if you need someone for your 1v1 team, I will be happy to partner with you.2. Limit the rosters. We've got teams with 12-14 member rosters when only 4 or 5 actually play anyway. Limiting the roster to double the team size (ie. a 3v3 team could only have 6 members) would give more people who've been riding the bench a chance to play, create more teams and make for more diverse levels of gameplay. A limited team will certainly have to be more committed to playing, but with separate divisions for skill levels more people will be interested in playing knowing they won't lose by 1,000 every match they play.
A fine idea. A recruiter is always a good thing to have. Hmmm, maybe we could use one here too?3. Have an admin whose sole responsibility is recruiting for CAL. There are more than a few clans out there that have no idea what CAL is all about and would possibly be interested in playing but haven't got a clue of where to start. The CAL recruiting admin would act as a liaison to help them become familiar with where to register, help them with server set up, maybe take them through the process of a CAL based scrim to show them what to expect. This admin needs to be visible, available, friendly and willing to help.
My experience in the corporate environment, and as a Board Member for various organizations tells me this is the best way to run things. Once you start being lenient, people tend to believe the rules are open to interpretation and are sure to get upset when disciplined.4. Enforce the rules. I understand that in the past we've made allowances for this and that, but with new teams participating it sets a bad precedent. Otherwise, "Well Team X was allowed to do it", will be argued from here on. With this will come some major headaches because there will be new issues and arguments that arise and the rules will have to be scrutinized and loopholes plugged to keep the peace, but it will make the league more efficient, balanced and professional in the long run. If there needs to be another admin just for this to ease some of the pressure on the division admins then so be it.
Agreed.5. There is no "right" way to play HL2DM. Don't get me wrong, I despise low gravity, I hate killboxes, but if you look at what people are playing in the packed public servers it's a very different game than what we think of as HL2DM. CAL will have to develope some flexibility for the game to continue. Part-time players aren't committed enough to learn advanced techniques but may still want to play in a tournament of some sort. I don't have a solution here; maybe it's a killbox division, maybe shellshock, maybe something different.
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2008-10-03 03:07:51
[EYE] Valar
2008-10-03 03:28:33
i don't know rico but his post is beautiful indeed.{EE}chEmicalBurn wrote:Rico, i cried a lil while reading your post. i never knew you could write such beautiful things.
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2008-10-03 05:27:28
Rico is EE's fearless leader, a scholar and a gentleman. and apperently a poet of sorts[EYE] Valar wrote:i don't know rico but his post is beautiful indeed.{EE}chEmicalBurn wrote:Rico, i cried a lil while reading your post. i never knew you could write such beautiful things.
i'm truly happy to see the direction this thread is taking and hope it infects hl2DM further and further.
It's great to see the community starting to coalesce.
badinfluence
2008-10-03 19:07:05
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2008-10-03 19:22:14
badinfluence wrote:I had always thought CAL was a bit, biased. Yes, I said it. There was no point in ever joining in 2v2 or 4v4 because who wins it every year? $W, VDuS, or flas. Nothing changed since season one. What's the point in joining to know you are going to get beat? The only solution that I had every thought to this was to split up the teams. Everyone knows everyone pretty well so why not split up VDuS or $W. These teams would be completely against it though.
I always tell my coach how many goals I scored in a hockey game. His reply was always but how many assists (Passing it to a team mate to score) did you get? I'd usually reply 0, but don't quti reading yet. I think if we did split up the teams it'd be on the better players to get their team mates to get them better. This was what my coach was saying. "I know you're good, but can you make your team mates better?"
I know that nobody will go for this, but it was just a thought anyways.
And on the point of getting stomped on, I believe it was old time who said that this was his first CAL season and he played 2 matches. He said he got owned but had fun doing it. I call BS on this because I know from personal experience that nobody has fun getting beat and beat and beat. If we did mix up the teams, it'd be like draft night where everyone got a chance. Speaking of this though, I think it'd be a keen idea to have a draft night then use those teams for CAL. Draft night was pretty much ALWAYS even in the ones I played. This, I think, would be the most fairest way to do CAL.
Zman42
2008-10-03 19:55:31
cyboy bunny
2008-10-03 20:44:21
Paradox
2008-10-03 21:59:56
Well good players don't want to play with people that are not equal to them in skill, plain and simple. Nothing wrong with that, its just the way it is. They want to win so they need team mates that can all pull equally to win. Put someone with my suxzor skills on a team with SW or VduS quality players and they risk losing because I am a black hole of kills against my team when its like that.{EE}chEmicalBurn wrote:badinfluence wrote:The only solution that I had every thought to this was to split up the teams. Everyone knows everyone pretty well so why not split up VDuS or $W. These teams would be completely against it though.
I think if we did split up the teams it'd be on the better players to get their team mates to get them better. This was what my coach was saying. "I know you're good, but can you make your team mates better?"
I know that nobody will go for this, but it was just a thought anyways.
ya, this will never happen. the big thing about being good at CAL is knowing your teammates style of play and talking to them in TS. in theory a good idea, just would never happen, plus everybody likes to play with their friends
PwNs3ttia
2008-10-05 08:15:50
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2008-10-06 00:47:30
PwNs3ttia wrote:wow an intelligent, cool, even-headed discussion in hl2dm :O
Fearsome*
2008-10-06 08:55:02
While some people are talking about a overhaul that is not what is in mind. Some changes happen every season and will keep happening but you cant compare anything if you change 10 things at the same time to decided if they were successful or not. If a Killbox league is in then that will probably be the focus of this seasons changes.{EE} Uncle Rico wrote:If we're discussing a complete overhaul of HL2DM in CAL there are plenty of issues to be addressed that have made CAL into a snoozefest for the past couple of seasons.
1. It's almost painfull to get 8 people in different timezones, with different schedules and different resposbility levels together at the same time. Why not switch down to a 3v3 league? Two less players makes for better play on most of the maps we use for 4v4. 4v4 has always seemed like a complete clusterfuck on most maps we play anyway and it's more difficult finding new maps that accommodate 4v4 play.
2. Limit the rosters. We've got teams with 12-14 member rosters when only 4 or 5 actually play anyway. Limiting the roster to double the team size (ie. a 3v3 team could only have 6 members) would give more people who've been riding the bench a chance to play, create more teams and make for more diverse levels of gameplay. A limited team will certainly have to be more committed to playing, but with separate divisions for skill levels more people will be interested in playing knowing they won't lose by 1,000 every match they play.
3. Have an admin whose sole responsibility is recruiting for CAL. There are more than a few clans out there that have no idea what CAL is all about and would possibly be interested in playing but haven't got a clue of where to start. The CAL recruiting admin would act as a liaison to help them become familiar with where to register, help them with server set up, maybe take them through the process of a CAL based scrim to show them what to expect. This admin needs to be visible, available, friendly and willing to help.
4. Enforce the rules. I understand that in the past we've made allowances for this and that, but with new teams participating it sets a bad precedent. Otherwise, "Well Team X was allowed to do it", will be argued from here on. With this will come some major headaches because there will be new issues and arguments that arise and the rules will have to be scrutinized and loopholes plugged to keep the peace, but it will make the league more efficient, balanced and professional in the long run. If there needs to be another admin just for this to ease some of the pressure on the division admins then so be it.
5. There is no "right" way to play HL2DM. Don't get me wrong, I despise low gravity, I hate killboxes, but if you look at what people are playing in the packed public servers it's a very different game than what we think of as HL2DM. CAL will have to develope some flexibility for the game to continue. Part-time players aren't committed enough to learn advanced techniques but may still want to play in a tournament of some sort. I don't have a solution here; maybe it's a killbox division, maybe shellshock, maybe something different.
The question at this point becomes about our community's level of commitment to the game. We can continue to have a half-ass league with a few teams dominating because their egos wouldn't allow any room for a loss furthering the lack of interest, or we can completely restructure CAL into a league for new players to not only have fun but to learn more about the game and generate more competition. CAL will not build/rebuild itself. It would take a ton of work on the part of admins, the community and the teams, but if you want CAL to continue things need to change.
Uncle Rico
2008-10-06 11:27:55
While some people are talking about a overhaul that is not what is in mind.
Why is it less dynamic? A match becomes more playable and less about a clusterfucked, spawn killing, "I CAN'T FIND A FUCKING WEAPON" mess in maps that aren't suited for 8 people.1 - of course less players is easier to coordinate. But its also less team play and less dynamic. This almost becomes pointless why have 2v2 and 3v3? If we were to look at this it should be along the lines of get rid of 2v2 and 4v4 and just have 3v3 so we can build 1 strong standard league like the euros have. But then again it still comes down to it hardly being a team play event. Also this issue is going to be worked against solving in several other suggestions.
Of course you don't see a gain. Refer back to the earlier pic please. There's a few teams with 9-10 members that are all active players. Limit that roster to 6-8 = have several more teams.2 - this sounds nice on paper but put it into effect and I do not see the gain.
Then your "once a season" people would have to form a team and actually play through a season if they were interested in playing.Who has a roster loaded with bench warmers? Not $W most of our players are inactive if the roster gets limited Toad and Micah get cut as well as all the others that show up once a season.
And we recruit new active guys to fill the spots. And those active guys actually will sit the bench. If a player truely is active and wants to play they move to a new clan on their own much like moose did.
My clan operates just fine, thank you. You seem to think that clan = CAL team. We're talking about teams here, and the more you can get to participate in CAL the more flexibility you have in how the league is set up.If your clan does not operate like this then you might consider changing policy.
You have a team of 14 and did not have a backup this season in at least one case, so a large roster didn't seem to serve you well.The large roster allows people who do not really want to play to serve as back up in the event you cannot get enough players which helps with point 1 if you are willing to play a B player. It does not serve to sequester active players and prevent them from playing. Enacting this rule will most likely make solving issue 1 harder for our game.
My bad. I should have known you had already thought of it and planned it that way.3 - This is a good idea in fact it is what I brought nino in for cause I knew he would do this. And in fact he did. It is the talent any league desires most in him.
4 - This was really not a problem till this season when some people were dead set on trying to make it an issue. In order to pull it off a complete rewrite of the rules needs to happen which is something we are always working on.
Relaxing rules is one thing. Abandoning them for the benefit of saving face is another.Even so it will be a game killer for issue number 1. Main reason we relax is to allow people to complete matches who otherwise would fail.
You just had to go there. Members? Grain was allowed to finish the season, so I'm supposing you found no evidence of hacks, although no one has actually come forward to exonerate him. I don't recall you investigating anyone else on my team. If you had something to suspend one or more of my teammates for then you should have done it. I would have had more respect for you for it than bringing it up now in an effort to keep people on your side in a time when CAL players are unhappy with the way the league is being handled.Finals would be toast this season under these rules as well as a ton of other matches. And members of your team would be suspended.
You don't have to be a lawyer to have well written, concise rules and then follow those rules. What happened this season is exactly what should have happened to point out the flaws in the system and where improvements could be made. Any society, even a lame ass gamer's society that exists on forums and game servers, must be allowed to speak out in order to effectively change how things are managed if they are unsatisfied. This season, although fueled by controversy and disdain for players/teams, was the most interesting ones I've been a part of. The excessive delay caused a dramatic loss of momentum, but there is no doubt that this season will be one that is remembered.Even if we did do it given what happened this season because we are not lawers there is no way we could write them perfectly enough to stop what happened. When people are dead set on trying to get a match overturned or causing a problem they will pick away at anything no matter how well written and then an admin has to step in anyway and make a call.
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2008-10-06 16:43:26
before discussing a KB league I think the main focus of our CAL league should the expansion and growth of our current style of play. I have put forth many ideas on how to do this, 90% of which have sparked interest in the community. If we dont offer new teams a place to really be able to compete and learn it's not going to help CAL at all. Teams like FF who just played their first season would be MUCH more likely to come play again if they knew they had a chance to win more than 1 game. If teams like that and totally new teams knew they had a division to play in where they could learn team play, map strategy, comminication, and CAL rules, while have competitive games where the scores were close they would play. keeping our current one division and then throwing in a KB division is going to do nothing for the ppl that currently play CAL and/or players looking to partcipate in the current style. Im not saying im against a KB division, in fact im all for it, BUT if we are only going to focus on one addition this year, and I think most ppl would agree with this, we need to a development (or w/e you want to call it) division. This will draw new teams, new admins, bring back players that have dismissed this league, and keep players/teams that are on the bubble as to whether they are staying or not. Think about this for a second, right now we have players that are pissed off at CAL and the way its run. They are pissed at getting killed every match. They are not satisfied with playing in this league because they cant get the important skills down when they are losing games 300-100. I would be willing to bet that if you looked over the schedule you would find that games that were between 2 teams that were equal in teamplay skill were played on time and those that were between 2 teams that were not even close to being similar in experience were either played late, or forfeited. As with anything in life if you dont offer your customers an attractive product they are not going to be interested in it.Fearsome* wrote:
While some people are talking about a overhaul that is not what is in mind. Some changes happen every season and will keep happening but you cant compare anything if you change 10 things at the same time to decided if they were successful or not. If a Killbox league is in then that will probably be the focus of this seasons changes.
lead
2008-10-06 18:35:01
makes sense m8 more than some of the posts:D{EE}chEmicalBurn wrote:Fearsome* wrote:
While some people are talking about a overhaul that is not what is in mind. Some changes happen every season and will keep happening but you cant compare anything if you change 10 things at the same time to decided if they were successful or not. If a Killbox league is in then that will probably be the focus of this seasons changes.
SO, now, just by starting this new division you've not only kept a lot of good players you would have lost, attracted a lot more new players, sparked interest in the pub community but also you've made CAL an enjoyable place to play and learn.
Am I the only one that thinks this is a no-brainer?
ninojman
2008-10-06 18:36:35
Well you need to find someone for this job,Fearsome* wrote:3 - This is a good idea in fact it is what I brought nino in for cause I knew he would do this. And in fact he did. It is the talent any league desires most in him.
Finals would be toast this season under these rules as well as a ton of other matches. And members of your team would be suspended.
Grain was never exonerated. It's still open issue in fact. But funny how everything started back when Luke got back around, not when Grain got exonerated, which was the supposed reason for the break.You just had to go there. Members? Grain was allowed to finish the season, so I'm supposing you found no evidence of hacks, although no one has actually come forward to exonerate him. I don't recall you investigating anyone else on my team. If you had something to suspend one or more of my teammates for then you should have done it. I would have had more respect for you for it than bringing it up now in an effort to keep people on your side in a time when CAL players are unhappy with the way the league is being handled.
Zman42
2008-10-06 19:59:42
What he said. Instead of a killbox league we should start a cal-o and cal-m split league for all the reasons chem stated. As I've said before I'd be more than happy to admin this because I honestly think this is the best way to grow the game and have more teams in cal.{EE}chEmicalBurn wrote:A bunch of good points...
Paradox
2008-10-06 20:10:57
As a relativly new person to league play, I can truly relate to these sentiments. I also have 2 seasons under my belt and we now have members of Khaos with that much time under theirs, but we are new as a team together and we need to work out the teawork aspects for our group as well.{EE}chEmicalBurn wrote:
They (new teams) are pissed at getting killed every match. They are not satisfied with playing in this league because they cant get the important skills down when they are losing games 300-100.
(With a "B" division, new teams will) understand what it means to play like a team, to communicate effectively in team speak or maybe even figure out that there is such a thing as team speak, how important it is to stick together and starve other teams of supplies, learn to use the death cam to a teams advantage, how to listen to sounds around them for clues. etc. this is my second season of CAL and im just starting to learn these things, BUT if i wasnt part of EE and didnt have the advantage of players with CAL experience in my clan, i would have been gone a long time ago. A lot of these new players dont have that luxury.
SO, now, just by starting this new division you've not only learn.
Paradox
2008-10-06 21:42:17
Is probably a mutual feeling.Well you need to find someone for this job,
As I stated above, this was handled poorly by everyone involved and we all share part of the blame. This has created a huge rift in the community that has truly been sad to witness. It will take a community effort to heal that rift. I am willing to work at it, are you?(Uncle Rico)....a time when CAL players are unhappy with the way the league is being handled.
Uncle Rico
2008-10-06 23:45:50
In any work environment where a company is failing in it's goal, the people need to speak out and openly defy what they see is wrong. If no one speaks out against mis-management then the company will continue to fail until it has to close.Paradox wrote:The job is his and there is a heirarchy in CAL, he is in essense Ko's and yours and my supervisor. Like us Fearsome also has people above him. Do you blatently disregard your boss's decisions at work? I doubt it because you would not be employed there very long. I don't always agree with Fearsome either, but I sure as hell don't openly defy the decisions he makes and I don't question them on a public forum. I discuss it with him privately and we hash it out.
The playoff suspension was more than long enough for an investigation. If after 3 weeks you can't reach a decision then you have a problem. That problem being that someone is desperately trying to find something that isn't there to keep themselves from looking like an ass or something else is going on. I'm even more in shock to find out that the matter is still considered open at this point. That's just pathetic.Then you openly rescheduled matches when they were suspended creating what I will call Drama episode 3. You found out that Ko and I didn't support your decision to do so. The community figured this out when Ko and I had to post that these matches should not be happening and that in turn made the league and the admins look bad because we obviously were not in agreement on the issue. Both Ko and I tried to engage you in a discussion in the CAL admin private section but you ignored us.
I was the one using match comm for the flas match. I did not INSIST on default time. I told them to plan on Thursday, I wasn't definite about it and they had already said they were available most weekdays including the default. I tried to reschedule after I found out my team was unavailable and they refused. I'll take the blame for not knowing my team was away/busy, but I won't take all of it since the match still could have happened. Either way, we were willing to let flas have the FW without argument. They were more prepared and more motivated to play in the finals than us and they deserved to be there. Congrats to you flas members btw, you guys played a great season.And as far as the 5 forfeits in 14, I assume you mean the playoffs. Well 3 of them were a result of the drama itself and the dishearting of teams. The other 2 were your own teams forfeits. The first was your team refusing to play in childish display of unsportsman like conduct. The second was your team insisting on the default time (knowing your opponent would have a hard time meeting it?) then your players not showing up when the other team had all of theirs ready. The only reason the playoffs are finally over is because I set a hard default to cut the shit from happening.
The "rift" is nothing but a result of disatisfaction and as you are finally starting to understand the majority is speaking out now against what went on this season. We don't all share part of the blame. We merely pointed out things that should be questioned. Of course arguments will arise, that is how things are discussed and changes are made. As long as people don't get their feelings hurt and try to retaliate by other means, things can be settled and we can move on.As I stated above, this was handled poorly by everyone involved and we all share part of the blame. This has created a huge rift in the community that has truly been sad to witness. It will take a community effort to heal that rift. I am willing to work at it, are you?(Uncle Rico)....a time when CAL players are unhappy with the way the league is being handled.
Now to Fearsome: The community is calling for something to be done.
badinfluence
2008-10-06 23:49:01
When was the last time someone was recruited for $W? dot c?Fearsome* wrote:
And we recruit new active guys to fill the spots. And those active guys actually will sit the bench.
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2008-10-07 00:40:00
you're joking, right?badinfluence wrote:When was the last time someone was recruited for $W? dot c?Fearsome* wrote:
And we recruit new active guys to fill the spots. And those active guys actually will sit the bench.
Walking Target
2008-10-07 01:44:27
Uncle Rico
2008-10-07 01:56:37
Paradox
2008-10-07 03:55:40
Abraham Lincoln said "A house divided against itself can not stand". I am not saying there should not be disagreement, just get together and talk about it like adults, not by stirring up shit and creating drama. More is accomplished through rational discussion than by arguement and inflamatory actions and comments.In any work environment where a company is failing in it's goal, the people need to speak out and openly defy what they see is wrong. If no one speaks out against mis-management then the company will continue to fail until it has to close.
OK Heres the facts about the time line of events, all backed up by the News on the CAL website and my fast DL server log (which I do not maintain myself, the host company does that).The playoff suspension was more than long enough for an investigation. If after 3 weeks you can't reach a decision then you have a problem. That problem being that someone is desperately trying to find something that isn't there to keep themselves from looking like an ass or something else is going on. I'm even more in shock to find out that the matter is still considered open at this point. That's just pathetic.
Again, a calm rational discussion would have been a much better choice, not creating drama on these forums and on IRC by flinging insults and accusations. Then yes things can be resolved and progress made once again.The "rift" is nothing but a result of disatisfaction and as you are finally starting to understand the majority is speaking out now against what went on this season. We don't all share part of the blame. We merely pointed out things that should be questioned. Of course arguments will arise, that is how things are discussed and changes are made. As long as people don't get their feelings hurt and try to retaliate by other means, things can be settled and we can move on.
Paradox, please don't take any offense to anything I've said to you. I'm merely making points. There's no need to take any of it personally.
Thank you Rico, I do not take my job as admin lightly and I try very hard to remain objective and to do the best I can for the league. I consider many of you to be my friends and I hope to continue to do what I can.You've always been a helpful and considerate admin, available at any time for us players.
Have you thought about why this is? I pride myself in a high level of honesty and integrity and in real life it is one of the things I am known for. I dont stand behind someone lightly and if I felt there was wrong doing I would not give that support. People are always quick to judge and first impressions are always the hardest to overcome. I will admit, I once had gotten the impression from others that $W were an elitist group of snobs that looked down on everyone and just went around pounding on pub players for the hell of it. I was intimidated by all of them because of their reputation. I even ran away from them when they showed up in a server.My only criticism is that you are standing behind someone who is about to be bulldozed by a disgruntled community.
graffitiknockout
2008-10-07 04:16:15
I don't know how this rumor got started, but I wasn't ever on vacation. There was a period where I wasn't on steam, because I was busy with school. But I was always in contact in case I was needed for a match, which is why I ended up getting back on steam anyways :/ninojman wrote: But funny how everything started back when Luke got back around, not when Grain got exonerated, which was the supposed reason for the break.
teto
2008-10-07 04:22:01
L2k
2008-10-07 05:27:35
Uncle Rico
2008-10-07 05:47:31
I'm not creating drama. You may see it as drama, but it's merely discussion. Things got more direct after Fearsome felt the need to point fingers, and although some of my posts have been a bit "harsh" as Zman put it, they serve a purpose.Paradox wrote: Abraham Lincoln said "A house divided against itself can not stand". I am not saying there should not be disagreement, just get together and talk about it like adults, not by stirring up shit and creating drama. More is accomplished through rational discussion than by arguement and inflamatory actions and comments.
I'm really tired of re-living this. This Para, is drama, what you had before was discussion. But for the record, those are not complete facts.OK Heres the facts about the time line of events, all backed up by the News on the CAL website and my fast DL server log (which I do not maintain myself, the host company does that).
August 11th - the playoffs were suspended
Somewhere in this time it was determined that non-cal demos were not admissible.
August 24th - I get Grain's CAL demos in hand after several attempts to submit them over the previous week. I did not get them to Ko and Fearsome until at least 2 days later.
September 2nd - Announcement that the playoffs would resume
So in reality until the CAL demos could be looked at, there was no basis for judgement. After the CAL demos were in hand, a week later the announcement came that playoffs would resume. Whether or not this has to do with Lukes schedule (as alluded to) I cant say because I dont watch his calender that closely. What its actual status is at this point I really do not know as I have not been informed either way.
My issue here is with CAL and the way it's been managed, not $W or it's members.Have you thought about why this is? I pride myself in a high level of honesty and integrity and in real life it is one of the things I am known for. I dont stand behind someone lightly and if I felt there was wrong doing I would not give that support. People are always quick to judge and first impressions are always the hardest to overcome. I will admit, I once had gotten the impression from others that $W were an elitist group of snobs that looked down on everyone and just went around pounding on pub players for the hell of it. I was intimidated by all of them because of their reputation. I even ran away from them when they showed up in a server.
Since becoming admin myself, I have worked hard to get to know all of the admins, ops and others as well as possible by talking to them and by paying attention in IRC. In the process I have found Conflict, Luke, DeathBringer and even Fearsome to be a cool bunch of guys (as well as yourself and others). This means that the impression I once had from other people was quite wrong. Fearsome doesn't talk much so its harder to figure him out, but I also know what the upper level admins and what others that have worked with him in the hl2dm world think about him. I will tell you that most people's impression is incorrect, at least from my point of view.
What you are witnessing is not the collapse of CAL, you're seeing potential for renewed interest. If CAL were to collapse, there's not much that you could say or do to prevent it. Progress and change is painful, because flaws have to be pointed out, and sometimes in this process personalities collide. Stop trying to keep the peace. We're big boys and girls here.What I am trying to do now is to prevent this community by bulldozing itself by trying to keep the rational lines of communication open, to try and be open to ideas and to make progress on the things we can do to make CAL better. It isnt going to happen overnight and people need to be patient and help out where they can by coming to the table with a cool head and mind to be part of the solution instead of trying to create more problems and more drama.
badinfluence
2008-10-07 07:07:31
{EE}chEmicalBurn wrote:you're joking, right?badinfluence wrote:When was the last time someone was recruited for $W? dot c?Fearsome* wrote:
And we recruit new active guys to fill the spots. And those active guys actually will sit the bench.
BuckyKatt
2008-10-07 08:05:06
L2k wrote:I would play killbox and stock divisions, and I am all for it.
I am also very much in favor of invite, main and open divisions in 1v1, 2v2 and 3v3. I think 4v4 should be dropped as its plagued with issues from map designs to lag to scheduling. Also in Killbox I would prefer it to be 1v1 but thats just me, if there is a desire for teams in killbox then that should be considered. If the players are not there to support a divison or game type after preseason, things could be condensed and proceed. With out trying we will never know, lack of admins seems not to be a issue anymore.
I also think we should get away from problems that occurred last season and move forward not backward.
o-dog
2008-10-07 08:22:38
Paradox
2008-10-07 10:08:23
[EYE] Valar
2008-10-07 17:47:56
badinfluence
2008-10-07 18:03:28
Ko-Tao
2008-10-08 02:08:58
Until the recent expression of player interest for split divisions, there were serious doubts as to the viability of 2 divisions per format, let alone 3. I think we will start with open and invite, for the 1v1 league anyway, and go from there.L2k wrote: I am also very much in favor of invite, main and open divisions in 1v1, 2v2 and 3v3.
Agreed, though i think a player vote would be best.L2k wrote:I think 4v4 should be dropped as its plagued with issues from map designs to lag to scheduling.
Some arenas, like aim_arena or the tower arenas, have large amounts of vertical play while some killboxes, such as that circular tsgk box with only 2 levels (donut?) have almost no vertical play at all. Also, several arenas have lifts / bouncers / ramps, while some boxes have none, and visibility can vary quite a bit depending on the box or arena, with some having nowhere near 90%, often being under 50%.[EYE] Valar wrote: Appendix :
Killbox - is a medium to large ROOM. gameplay is mostly vertical. has lifts and or jumppads. dm_killbox_final is a Killbox.
Arena - is usually a detailed horizontal level. gameplay is mainly horizontal. dm_agora and dm_fragyard
are Arenas.
The only thing which links both styles is the 90-100% visibility otherwise they're totally different. and this is also the only thing which differentiates them from Stock style maps.
Sacrifist
2008-10-08 03:57:19
Really? I think that is a disgrace to Killbox style of play. I personally think it should be at least 3 vs 3. Why? Because Killbox maps are about hectic, nonstop, kill or be killed, gameplay. The strategy is shoot first and think later lol.[EYE] Valar wrote:i agree the two game styles should be separated to two divisions.
i personally think any real Killbox match is 1v1 and no more than that.
mLIQUID
2008-10-08 22:49:48
Shinigami
2008-10-12 19:16:52
L2k
2008-10-12 22:03:44
And your bringing this up here? Why? I thought we were talking about CAL, not Luke.Shinigami wrote:As for the latest LUKE rumour, jeez *I* saw him constantly on IM and we spent tons of time talking about the goffiest things during that period of time, I have all the crazy pictures and videos to prove it, so give it a rest, PLEASE!POMP
Shinigami
2008-10-12 22:26:54
[EYE] Valar
2008-10-13 00:33:28
badinfluence
2008-10-13 04:05:18
"I hate the drama"Shinigami wrote:
I hate the drama, thats what has made me want to leave all of this for a long time but I love the game and I care about what happens to the game. As for the latest LUKE rumour, jeez *I* saw him constantly on IM and we spent tons of time talking about the goffiest things during that period of time, I have all the crazy pictures and videos to prove it, so give it a rest, PLEASE!
POMP
Zman42
2008-10-13 20:49:32
yeah seriously pomp what the fuck.... ?badinfluence wrote:"I hate the drama"Shinigami wrote:
I hate the drama, thats what has made me want to leave all of this for a long time but I love the game and I care about what happens to the game. As for the latest LUKE rumour, jeez *I* saw him constantly on IM and we spent tons of time talking about the goffiest things during that period of time, I have all the crazy pictures and videos to prove it, so give it a rest, PLEASE!
POMP
"Quotes rumor adding to drama."
Lol.