MondaySunshine
2010-06-02 05:36:14
I would like your feedback on the rules! If you don't like something, tell me why.
MondaySunshine
2010-06-02 05:36:14
Uncle Rico
2010-06-02 06:32:04
Servers should maintain at least 3 locked sourcetv slots on 90 second delay so that admins can pop in at any time during matches.MondaySunshine wrote:Per eFPS rules, found here, I am the head administrator for the hl2dm eFPS league. My two sub-administrators are Valiums and BuckyKatt. The website will be operational in about two weeks, at which time we will begin to register teams and get things rolling. Matches will start about two weeks after that.
I would like your feedback on the rules! If you don't like something, tell me why.
MondaySunshine
2010-06-02 06:39:49
I thought the server logs was a given, but about the SourceTV - we're not going to use sourceTV or even allow spectators during matches. There is a spectate bug that allows invisible spectators. The easiest and safest way to prevent this is to disable spectate altogether.Uncle Rico wrote:Servers should maintain at least 3 locked sourcetv slots on 90 second delay so that admins can pop in at any time during matches.MondaySunshine wrote:Per eFPS rules, found here, I am the head administrator for the hl2dm eFPS league. My two sub-administrators are Valiums and BuckyKatt. The website will be operational in about two weeks, at which time we will begin to register teams and get things rolling. Matches will start about two weeks after that.
I would like your feedback on the rules! If you don't like something, tell me why.
Head admins should have access to server logs.
voz
2010-06-02 06:49:45
Uncle Rico
2010-06-02 06:51:15
Nothing is ever a given. Make sure both of those issues are stated.MondaySunshine wrote:I thought the server logs was a given, but about the SourceTV - we're not going to use sourceTV or even allow spectators during matches. There is a spectate bug that allows invisible spectators. The easiest and safest way to prevent this is to disable spectate altogether.Uncle Rico wrote:Servers should maintain at least 3 locked sourcetv slots on 90 second delay so that admins can pop in at any time during matches.MondaySunshine wrote:Per eFPS rules, found here, I am the head administrator for the hl2dm eFPS league. My two sub-administrators are Valiums and BuckyKatt. The website will be operational in about two weeks, at which time we will begin to register teams and get things rolling. Matches will start about two weeks after that.
I would like your feedback on the rules! If you don't like something, tell me why.
Head admins should have access to server logs.
the_big_cheese
2010-06-02 06:58:32
No way 2/3 of people will show up to your forums to vote, let alone vote the same way. Lots of people register and then lose interest or simply don't care what happens.2.7 Any registered league player may start a vote on the EverythingFPS forums to force an administrator vote, veto an administrator action, or remove an administrator. In order for a vote to pass, two-thirds of all registered league players must vote in the affirmative within one week.
Ok, as someone who has played dm for a while but never been in "that circle of players that know what everybody is up to and consider it highly privileged and secret information", I'm gonna say that this is a detrimental rule. First of all ,you're not protecting anybody. Its not like a person is going to get blacklisted because somebody got butthurt and yelled hacks. Give people the accusation and the demos, and let them decide for themselves. Even if I disagree with the leagues decision, I'll still respect it. Second of all, from what I've seen, a community of people is way better at pinning proof on a guy then a league of admins. How many hackers did CAL convict while they were secretly reviewing demos? I can't think of any. Not to mention half the community would call bullshit admins and not believe it anyway.2.6. All accusations of cheating must be investigated. Such investigations must remain private until a decision has been reached.
3.7 If a player suspects another player of cheating or violating another league rule, that player should contact an administrator privately. A player who publicly accuses another player of cheating may receive a penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct.
Uncle Rico
2010-06-02 06:59:45
My sourcetv suggestion wasn't for demos. It was so that an admin could jump in and watch a match at any given time to check for shifty behavior. If there's an exploit though, I agree, leave it out.voz wrote:STV demos would be kind of pointless if he has everyones pov demo imo.
Va|iums
2010-06-02 07:19:56
the_big_cheese
2010-06-02 08:03:13
Why, you don't think we can handle it until its 'resolved'?Third response, the hacking accusations once we see fit will be completely disclosed when the matter has resolved itself.
ninjins
2010-06-02 08:30:20
Va|iums
2010-06-02 08:36:37
Why, you don't think we can handle it until its 'resolved'?[/quote]the_big_cheese wrote: Third response, the hacking accusations once we see fit will be completely disclosed when the matter has resolved itself.
the_big_cheese
2010-06-02 09:19:16
Va|iums
2010-06-02 09:27:33
Disagreed. I will not be participating in revealing any and every cheating accusation. If we allow that we'll start having *FOR EXAMPLE* someone in TPA accusing Constipator of hacking just cause' and then the community is gonna be like oooooooooh ahhhhhhhhh Constipator might be hackingz?!?! No I won't do it, the community is free to review our evidence once we make a decision and may overturn us but I will not be revealing every single hacking accusation.the_big_cheese wrote:My point is that a structure like this should not be trying to force its views on people. You think innocent until proven guilty, others aren't so kind. Your job is to run a league and keep cheaters out. Your job is not to try to uphold people's reputations. I know you're a nice guy Valiums and you're just trying to help people out, but its still bias.
"Also your other comments are disturbing, no form of governance should be a dictatorship, ever."
I'll just say that I disagree and leave it at that.
MondaySunshine
2010-06-02 09:39:46
the_big_cheese
2010-06-02 10:24:00
Seriously who's gonna do that? People would just play with him and observe that he doesn't hack and be done with it. Perhaps I give people who I've played with for years and who know this game inside-and-out too much credit.Va|iums wrote: If we allow that we'll start having *FOR EXAMPLE* someone in TPA accusing Constipator of hacking just cause' and then the community is gonna be like oooooooooh ahhhhhhhhh Constipator might be hackingz?!?!
Va|iums
2010-06-02 10:29:26
Constipator
2010-06-02 10:35:20
Va|iums
2010-06-02 10:40:56
s0iz
2010-06-02 20:50:23
phantom
2010-06-02 23:15:10
koncentrate
2010-06-03 00:38:29
2.1 The head administrator will be given lifetime tenure.
Va|iums
2010-06-03 00:52:06
If you read the rest you'd know he can be removed by a vote. Basically lifetime unless he starts f*cking up bad.koncentrate wrote:2.1 The head administrator will be given lifetime tenure.
i lol´d at this. (didnt read all the rules)
wish you guys good luck with that league.
Fearsome*
2010-06-03 02:12:50
voz
2010-06-03 04:49:11
MondaySunshine
2010-06-03 06:00:50
Paradox
2010-06-03 06:11:59
Neither does MW2.MondaySunshine wrote:. Quake Live won't be supported because it does not have servers, custom maps, or custom skins.
two snails
2010-06-03 10:27:46
BuckyKatt
2010-06-03 10:48:51
Ko-Tao
2010-06-03 13:20:43
provost
2010-06-03 20:09:28
I don't see a problem with a game that doesn't have skins or maps. Servers are vital imo, cod4 over mw2.Paradox wrote:Neither does MW2.MondaySunshine wrote:. Quake Live won't be supported because it does not have servers, custom maps, or custom skins.
BFBC2 has servers but no custom maps/skins
COD4 has a few custom maps but almost no one plays them because custom maps mean a non ranked server.
MondaySunshine
2010-06-03 21:46:34
Va|iums
2010-06-04 00:57:46
CoNfuSed
2010-06-04 01:24:20
Uncle Rico
2010-06-04 02:43:14
If the exploit exists, remove all room for it's use and eliminate sourcetv until it can be resolved. Doesn't matter who the team is, it will never be an issue if it's not a possibility. The only time anyone bothers watching matches is during finals anyway.Va|iums wrote:I agree with Four...I mean Fearsome. I think we need to make exceptions with all or some of the matches in regards to spectating. Like make the championship or most anticipated games only speccable, if not make ALL games speccable.
Even with the ghosting bug, ghosting is probably not gonna be utilized by the more respectable clans like $W, em0 or synergy, and I doubt any of them even know how to. Let's even say the ghosting bug is utlized by them, how much is it really gonna help? Everyone knows where the f*ck you are you like at all times. In caverns one team is usually holing up on the other side, the other team in the mag area/armor area. In Lockdown one team is controlling armor area, one team is controlling the orbs. Ghosting wouldnt change anything IMO.
Uncle Rico
2010-06-04 02:44:01
Do you not remember the size of the CS and CS:S leagues in CAL?CoNfuSed wrote:tbh I don't really see why have so many games, especially games like css which already have all their established teams, plus I don't know who's going to play it if there is no cash prizes or other sorts of prizes to win (for games like css that is)
Paradox
2010-06-04 03:11:03
ninojman
2010-06-04 04:00:57
MondaySunshine wrote:css, tf2, l4d, l4d2, cod4, mw2, bc2, and hl2dm. Quake Live won't be supported because it does not have servers, custom maps, or custom skins.
CoNfuSed
2010-06-04 04:17:59
Mr. Nervous
2010-06-04 04:18:48
For all it's worth, I know me and a few buddies would play the CSS, TF2, and L4D/L4D2 leagues (in addition to hl2dm), and I personally think getting other games into the picture would be good. And many people play, even if no prizes are involved. Many people just want a GOOD GAME to play and not only have pubs to play on.MondaySunshine wrote:css, tf2, l4d, l4d2, cod4, mw2, bc2, and hl2dm.
Fearsome*
2010-06-04 05:30:03
Divinity
2010-06-04 05:31:34
BuckyKatt
2010-06-04 08:09:47
I agree 100% with this. You have to learn to walk before you can run.Fearsome* wrote:Bugs are going to be popping up for months, trying to attack games with established leagues is kinda over zealous. I know from experience and watching others fail the most common way an organization screws up is trying to grow too fast. How about the first season you be realistic and start with 1 game HL2DM. Then maybe you add a second game by the time season two rolls around.
I know this isn't what Holy wants to hear but I think that Fearsome is correct here as well. I am committed to delivering eFPS but reading all these messages about adding this game or that game and taking on CEVO and what not is putting the cart before the horse. I had originally hoped to have a first iteration out in 2-4 weeks. I suspect that I wasn't clear to Holy that the first iteration wouldn't be a production ready site hence Holy's original announcement. My mistake, I am used to dealing with developers who know iterative development. The first iteration is more like a glimpse into the future and a chance for stake holders (Holy and myself) and subject matter experts (Fearsome, Ko-Tao, etc.) to take a look and provide feedback on the general direction the site is taking. So yes... a second season of CU is advisable if for no other reason than to give me time to actually do this right instead of trying to rush it and end up with something that either doesn't work or that no one wants to use.Fearsome* wrote:And as I stated before this 2 week start up time is ridiculous run at least one more season at CU while you build the website and get a beta out that people can look at and then people will not be rushing you.
Va|iums
2010-06-04 08:40:58
Fearsome*
2010-06-04 09:25:33
Va|iums
2010-06-04 09:31:53
srslyNOTnewguy
2010-06-04 10:10:15
Va|iums
2010-06-04 10:13:07
srslyNOTnewguy
2010-06-04 10:14:18
Blasphemy
2010-06-04 10:23:49
Constipator
2010-06-04 10:58:10
MondaySunshine
2010-06-04 11:29:48
Pigeon
2010-06-05 03:45:41
MondaySunshine wrote:you submit a demo
MondaySunshine wrote:Listen, guys. Here's
MondaySunshine wrote:the thread
LIKE, OMG HOLY! IT'S READY!??!?MondaySunshine wrote:as a normal player
voz
2010-06-05 05:17:18
Hes right!Pigeon wrote:MondaySunshine wrote:you submit a demoMondaySunshine wrote:Listen, guys. Here'sMondaySunshine wrote:the threadLIKE, OMG HOLY! IT'S READY!??!?MondaySunshine wrote:as a normal player
The Argumentalizer
2010-06-05 10:06:45
Va|iums
2010-06-05 21:33:44
The Argumentalizer wrote:Maybe admins could investigate allegations while the rest of the fucking league continues, rather then stop everything and everyone lose interest and nobody knows what the fuck is going on!?!?
the_big_cheese
2010-06-05 22:03:19
Va|iums
2010-06-05 22:08:14
the_big_cheese wrote:Well its play in a league without LSS protection or play in pubs without LSS protection and tbh I'd rather be playing some matches right now.
also, turn that frown upsidedown
voz
2010-06-05 23:56:49
I dont know what that means but Im getting the feeling that im being offendedVa|iums wrote:the_big_cheese wrote:Well its play in a league without LSS protection or play in pubs without LSS protection and tbh I'd rather be playing some matches right now.
also, turn that frown upsidedown
I don't have to turn it upside down, I'm already smiling remembering how badly I raped you the last time I played you. Terrible player, terrible logic. Let's say we start RIGHT now, I have the knowledge and power to do all of the following.
1. LSS scripting takes advantage of a major source engine hole in security. I can hide every single hack or script I want to.
2. I can change your server config at will and can bypass sv_cheats 1. In demo reviews I would have it on a toggle function to look unsuspicious, toggle sv_cheats 1 on and off at will.
3. I can make any script I want to undetectable by Zblock/KAK/Keepers
4. Give me another week understanding LSS scripting and I will be able to manually change your config, I can change your rates to make it look like your rate cycling and get you banned from the league.
5. I'm not the only one who knows how to take advantage of the source engine loophole and LSS scripting, for one Voz does, and I'm not surprised he wants to start the league early .
I am ready to resign though and let an admin replace me that is of the position to start it now. Perhaps I'll stay in the league and hack it up just for fun to prove how stupid it is to start early, but I have never tried a hack in my life, I only have the knowledge how to now and will never hack even though I do now, I dont need to.
the_big_cheese
2010-06-05 23:59:21
Harsh bro...Va|iums wrote:I don't have to turn it upside down, I'm already smiling remembering how badly I raped you the last time I played you. Terrible player, terrible logic.
MondaySunshine
2010-06-06 00:01:26
Va|iums
2010-06-06 00:08:46
That's what she said....MondaySunshine wrote:This entire argument doesn't matter. We're waiting on the website anyway. In the meantime we're working on fixing the issue.
Valium, understand you don't like Cheese's point, but that's no reason to pull out your Flamethrower
MondaySunshine
2010-06-06 00:43:38
Blasphemy
2010-06-06 01:36:58
voz
2010-06-06 01:41:00
Mr. Nervous
2010-06-06 02:26:08
phantom
2010-06-06 04:24:15
Creature
2010-06-06 05:53:37
MondaySunshine wrote:The entire idea for eFPS grew out of disappointment with CU. Judging by the general excitement level for eFPS, I can only assume that few people are seriously considering a return to CU. Here's what I propose. While we wait for the eFPS back-end to become user-ready, why don't we organize a Summer League? Let's do 2v2 and 1v1. I'll make some sign-up sheets. It won't be eFPS-official, and matches won't have to be played on eFPS-approved servers. Consider it an organized pick-up league while we all wait for something more substantial?
What do you guys think?
Uncle Rico
2010-06-06 06:30:07
Blasphemy
2010-06-07 04:49:03
voz
2010-06-07 05:59:09
but where is hl2dm at?
Paradox
2010-06-07 07:51:58
CoNfuSed
2010-06-07 22:12:29
Uncle Rico
2010-06-07 23:00:37
If this guy just adds the game in for shits -n- giggles, he's not going to be available when problems pop up.CoNfuSed wrote:About that xpl league. I actually know 2 of the guys that are starting the new league and one of them is in my css lan team. If I know that enough people are interested, enough meaning more than 3 - 4 teams like the other leagues we had. I can talk to him about it and he might want to make a hl2dm division.
REJECTED
2010-06-07 23:13:13
Yea, it's going to take people who actually care, agreed. Building the website will take time, especially when it's taking up Bucky's spare time. These things take time, even more so if you want it all polished with spit and shine.Uncle Rico wrote:If this guy just adds the game in for shits -n- giggles, he's not going to be available when problems pop up.
The best hope for an HL2DM league lies in people that actually give a fuck about HL2DM and want to help it out. Right now those people are Holy, Bucky and Val. If you impatient fags will get your panties out of your ass-crack and wait a while, it will be done and done right. I don't see what the rush is.
Va|iums
2010-06-07 23:18:37
Ty for the advice. Holy should change the official rules to include a provision to strongly encourage people to do that before playing any matches, though I sincerely doubt anyone here including myself has the complete knowledge to do it correctly yet.REJECTED wrote: Also, Vals, about changing the configs...whether it be on the server or client, make the config files read-only. The LUA scripts as far as I know, which isn't much (as far as LUA), shouldn't be able to write over your config files. That goes for any files you don't want overwritten.
thatguy
2010-06-07 23:23:51
ninojman
2010-06-07 23:31:12
Pernicious
2010-06-08 01:47:39
REJECTED wrote:Yea, it's going to take people who actually care, agreed. Building the website will take time, especially when it's taking up Bucky's spare time. These things take time, even more so if you want it all polished with spit and shine.Uncle Rico wrote:If this guy just adds the game in for shits -n- giggles, he's not going to be available when problems pop up.
The best hope for an HL2DM league lies in people that actually give a fuck about HL2DM and want to help it out. Right now those people are Holy, Bucky and Val. If you impatient fags will get your panties out of your ass-crack and wait a while, it will be done and done right. I don't see what the rush is.
Also, Vals, about changing the configs...whether it be on the server or client, make the config files read-only. The LUA scripts as far as I know, which isn't much (as far as LUA), shouldn't be able to write over your config files. That goes for any files you don't want overwritten.
I realize there are still other issues, but this may address that one.
MondaySunshine
2010-06-08 02:02:10
REJECTED
2010-06-08 03:09:34
It requires access to the Windows API, be it directly or indirectly. That being said, I don't know that LUA scripts being executed by the source engine have the ability to overwrite files. Making the config files read-only may not help. The scripts may simply be affecting the variables in memory and never actually cause your config files to be overwritten.Pernicious wrote: Uh, that doesnt make sense to me, server files cant be overwritten by lua, i think that requires actual hax, ie hacked dll file or something.
Pernicious
2010-06-08 04:35:35
Natural
2010-06-08 21:47:47
CoNfuSed
2010-06-08 22:12:50
Creature
2010-06-08 23:40:54
CoNfuSed wrote:Yes, but the thing about a free league (not saying it's bad or anything like that, I like playing in them still) is that for games like hl2dm where the community is very small, you won't get any new players, you'll just have the same couple of teams playing every season. I understand that hl2dm is an old game etc.etc. but I think we need a new or new-ish league that is trying to get sponsors etc. for hl2dm, especially if we have the extra chance of already knowing some people that are going to run the league because yes it's nice to have a league, but I'm pretty sure people are getting or eventually will get bored of playing the same 5 teams over and over again a couple of seasons in. So by getting the game in a new starting league with some kind of cash prize, doesn't have to be $5000 at the beginning like css, but just a good amount of money maybe $250 or something, then people signing up for that league will also be checking out other games that the league will be hosting and I think it's then that we might succeed in making hl2dm a bigger competitive game.
Just a FYI: The new league will not be XPL anymore, most admins are "retiring" from XPL to form another league because XPL was made really fast without much thought, so I think if we get our idea of hl2dm across to the new league admins they might consider this.
ninojman
2010-06-08 23:45:20
l4d2 didn't get in xpl. for a game this size a community run is going to be a better bet. The players in hl2dm could donate a couple bucks for prizes but it is not going to be enough for new teams to join. While it takes time new teams do happen. Look at the CAL's last season til CU, almost completel different teams. The game has always had good numbers just a high turn around rate. Almost no one is still around from the STA days and I know only 3 people are still around that even know what AAT means.CoNfuSed wrote:Yes, but the thing about a free league (not saying it's bad or anything like that, I like playing in them still) is that for games like hl2dm where the community is very small, you won't get any new players, you'll just have the same couple of teams playing every season. I understand that hl2dm is an old game etc.etc. but I think we need a new or new-ish league that is trying to get sponsors etc. for hl2dm, especially if we have the extra chance of already knowing some people that are going to run the league because yes it's nice to have a league, but I'm pretty sure people are getting or eventually will get bored of playing the same 5 teams over and over again a couple of seasons in. So by getting the game in a new starting league with some kind of cash prize, doesn't have to be $5000 at the beginning like css, but just a good amount of money maybe $250 or something, then people signing up for that league will also be checking out other games that the league will be hosting and I think it's then that we might succeed in making hl2dm a bigger competitive game.
Just a FYI: The new league will not be XPL anymore, most admins are "retiring" from XPL to form another league because XPL was made really fast without much thought, so I think if we get our idea of hl2dm across to the new league admins they might consider this.
CoNfuSed
2010-06-09 02:10:46
Va|iums
2010-06-09 03:15:34
We've already had a litmus test of an organization, a huge one at that let us exist under their larger organization, that was CAL. We've seen the results of the integration, a ton of new clans with CSS hotheads who thought they could learn the game in a week and assumed they had better skills automatically. They got annihiliated because of the skill gap and never came back, we ended up just wasting our time against these new clans and players completely. Not only that but we saw how upper admins interfered with the running of the HL2DM division who knew nothing about the game. I.E. the nutri grain demo review by a guy who was rumored to not even had the game downloaded at the time.CoNfuSed wrote:That's what everyone thinks in this community because of past experiences and that's one of the reason this game will never grow again. You can't think that by running a free community ran league you'll get attraction from other gamers. If you want the game to grow, what you need is a new/new-ish league that is willing to host hl2dm and give it some cash prizes. The hl2dm part of the league can still be ran by community members, but I really doubt that just community based leagues will really attract any new players or teams.
[EYE] Valar
2010-06-09 04:29:27
Ghost Dog_TSGK
2010-06-09 06:42:36
Ghost Dog_TSGK
2010-06-09 06:42:59
Ghost Dog_TSGK
2010-06-09 06:52:16
Panic
2010-06-09 08:52:56
Da1
2010-06-09 10:54:28
srslyNOTnewguy
2010-06-09 17:03:28
srslyNOTnewguy
2010-06-09 17:30:53
Panic
2010-06-09 21:23:32
ninojman
2010-06-09 22:13:28
Ghost Dog_TSGK
2010-06-09 23:58:05
The Argumentalizer
2010-06-10 01:09:25
srslyNOTnewguy
2010-06-10 02:32:32
The Argumentalizer
2010-06-10 04:08:36
voz
2010-06-10 04:21:39
The Argumentalizer
2010-06-10 06:55:46
MondaySunshine
2010-06-10 07:30:03
Uncle Rico
2010-06-10 07:33:43
hawt internet secks pl0xMondaySunshine wrote:Two Thumbs Up!
Oh, yeah, that's me. In b4 people say they want to sex me or don't want to sex me.
Ghost Dog_TSGK
2010-06-10 07:37:19
The Argumentalizer
2010-06-10 07:38:13
Uncle Rico
2010-06-10 07:39:34
nice sig thereGhost Dog_TSGK wrote:Oh we can do this.
The Argumentalizer
2010-06-10 07:40:25
Blasphemy
2010-06-10 08:54:14
beach bumMondaySunshine wrote:Two Thumbs Up!
Oh, yeah, that's me. In b4 people say they want to sex me or don't want to sex me.
Pernicious
2010-06-10 09:08:45
The Argumentalizer
2010-06-10 10:03:53
Pernicious
2010-06-10 11:27:18
The Argumentalizer
2010-06-10 11:49:37
Ghost Dog_TSGK
2010-06-10 21:17:44
Uncle Rico wrote:nice sig thereGhost Dog_TSGK wrote:Oh we can do this.
Panic
2010-06-10 21:55:32
Va|iums
2010-06-11 00:29:11
I've already sexed you, and it was good. Would reccomend as a personal manwhore or male escort to any lonely HL2DMU housewives, or even lonely old HL2DMU closet gays.MondaySunshine wrote:Two Thumbs Up!
Oh, yeah, that's me. In b4 people say they want to sex me or don't want to sex me.
the_big_cheese
2010-06-11 01:46:10
So you would fall into the latter category then??Va|iums wrote:I've already sexed you, and it was good. Would reccomend as a personal manwhore or male escort to any lonely HL2DMU housewives, or even lonely old HL2DMU closet gays.MondaySunshine wrote:Two Thumbs Up!
Oh, yeah, that's me. In b4 people say they want to sex me or don't want to sex me.
Va|iums
2010-06-11 04:42:37
I think I just heard a whisper coming from a lifelong mediocre player but I cant seem to see him.the_big_cheese wrote:So you would fall into the latter category then??Va|iums wrote:I've already sexed you, and it was good. Would reccomend as a personal manwhore or male escort to any lonely HL2DMU housewives, or even lonely old HL2DMU closet gays.MondaySunshine wrote:Two Thumbs Up!
Oh, yeah, that's me. In b4 people say they want to sex me or don't want to sex me.
ninojman
2010-06-11 05:02:33
the_big_cheese
2010-06-11 05:14:53
Va|iums
2010-06-11 05:48:44
ninojman
2010-06-17 03:29:41
Mr. Nervous
2010-06-17 04:02:33
God help us all if the troll crew here meets up with the troll crew at hl2dm-university.com.
Sacrifist
2010-06-18 23:11:49
That's just GrapeMr. Nervous wrote:From some guy named Merlyn in the eFPS topic at L4Dnao:God help us all if the troll crew here meets up with the troll crew at hl2dm-university.com.
[EYE] Valar
2010-06-18 23:59:01
Mr. Nervous
2010-06-19 01:27:25
Who? Me? Nah, some guy really said that lol, Idk if it's Grape tho.[EYE] Valar wrote:you're jk right?
Sacrifist
2010-06-19 07:56:20
lol yea. A lot of guys thought Merlyn was Grape there for a bit.[EYE] Valar wrote:you're jk right?
[EYE] Valar
2010-06-19 13:38:38