Zman42
2009-07-19 14:38:01
Zman42
2009-07-19 14:38:01
Blasphemy
2009-07-19 14:46:41
Zman42
2009-07-19 14:47:51
I don't give a fuck if I lose, I just don't like playing cheaters.Blasphemy wrote:hope you don't dispute when you lose in warzone too.
Blasphemy
2009-07-19 14:50:41
if you would have won, this thread wouldn't be here.Zman42 wrote:I don't give a fuck if I lose, I just don't like playing cheaters.Blasphemy wrote:hope you don't dispute when you lose in warzone too.
Zman42
2009-07-19 14:52:59
Absolutely not. All I want to do is clear out the bs players from the community, if I saw grain was cheating and I ended up winning I would still have called him on it.Blasphemy wrote:if you would have won, this thread wouldn't be here.Zman42 wrote:I don't give a fuck if I lose, I just don't like playing cheaters.Blasphemy wrote:hope you don't dispute when you lose in warzone too.
Blasphemy
2009-07-19 15:49:01
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2009-07-19 19:13:46
Panic
2009-07-19 22:54:41
Paradox
2009-07-20 00:29:52
thatguy
2009-07-20 01:53:16
CellarDweller
2009-07-20 02:12:15
its just not there. thats my take from watching the stv. i'll give some particulars... but im not gonna waste my time beyond that. its all explainable from visual and audible cues... even w/o hearing match comms which could have made the situation more obvious.
starting @ 11000, grain tosses a nade from sewers/front mag towards confused whose behind charger/crossbow room. nade doesnt kill confused. grain continues around front charger and lobs barrel (11344) at top charger. clearly thinking confused is still in that area. grain continues down hall towards back mag, takes 2 obvious mag shots to kill zman. at 11512, audible nade from right, grain turns right 180 degrees back towards front charger area while moving backwards (thinking confused may drop down behind him from top charger with nade). pb takes shotty blast from from back mag towards confused in the behind charger area (clearly comms could have confirmed to grain confused was still up there, but the shotty blast was enough of a cue). as grain continues backwards facing behind charger, he takes a mag shot which does not kill confused.
starting @ 20281, there is an audible battle between pb and zman. grain is at ramp/redroom sweeping and looking when confused becomes vissible in front charger area (right of screen). at 20388, pb is killed by zman with smg nade which is easily heard (and easily commed location). as grain turns from redroom to ramp, zman becomes visible in far right screen leaving control via bridge. grain snap shoots crossbow for kill.
starting at 28000, audible that someone is charging. grain moves towards back shotty and kills zman (obviously not the one charging). grain continues towards back mag. sweeps view left down hall towards font charger, sweeps further left back towards back shotty, audible nade from right... and grain sweeps view back to the right as confused becomes visible with a cooked nade. nice snap shot with crossbow for a kill.
then at tick 30000, grain gets killed? wtf is there to contend? so i stopped taking notes and watched the 48500-49000. again, its all rather easily explainable to visible and audible cues.
just went through grains demo. plenty of ineffective spam along with explainable kills. the only thing changed in my opinion is a stronger belief no aimbot was used. difficult to judge from the stv, but grains demo makes it easier. plenty of missed shots.
i didnt review the demo's with r_drawothermodels on. to me, if its explainable just watching in default mode, why use r_drawothermodels.
i would suggest watching w/o r_drawothermodels the first time. i may try r_drawothermodels tonight and review it again but i dont think it will change my opinion tbh.
edit...
while reviewing the tics confused supplied, i took notes using 3 categories:
audible cues
visual cues
unknown
i didnt see any unknown cues. but thats just my opinion.
wow, that r_drawothermodels 2 is pretty cool. but to me, it makes all the players look suspicious throughout the match. it seems like using a wiretap to look for probable cause, when all you have is a gut suspicion.
tic 13300... w/o the models on, it looks like crossbow spam that is very common. people also orb spam that very same path. with models on, u can see that he has the crossbow out and ready to shoot before the combine model becomes visible. doesnt change my opinion. looks like spam to me.
tic 20700... ive addressed this one before. w/o models on, audible nade cook from right just as NG is moving into back mag. he takes a last second shot toward the nade sound before the bars block the shot. with models on, it does look suspicious and for some reason i cant hear the nade cook as well. but i think i hear a spawn instead. if we had confused and z's demo's, i could confirm that. which again would lead me to believe it was two audible cues.
tic 35750... w/o models on, it looks like nade spam towards the ramp that was lucky. with models on, it looks suspicious, but... NG has primed and cooked the nade before the combine model becomes visible at 35859. that reinforces to me that he was spamming the nade and got lucky.
tic 68800... w/o models on, NG kills z under red room. goes up the hill, up pipes, into bathroom. audible spawn from right. NG launches barrel towards back shotty (ledge spawn), goes out onto the bridge and launches a cooked nade towards back shotty again. with models on, it would seem to disprove a wall hack. the combine model spawns in sewers and is clearly visible near stairs while NG appears to be attacking back shotty (ledge spawn) area.
nino, i have no problem with sharing what ive written here in this thread whenever you decide to rule on this. im sure i'll be ridiculed for my opinions, based on being unskilled and an admin noob. but i dont really care. its my opinion and i think i've justified it fairly.
i dont remember seeing a crash on the stv demo's, but i didnt specifically look for one. i watched the actual match on stv and remember chat at the beginning of round 2 asking NG what he did between rounds. seems like NG said he crashed, and Z or Confused were like... mhmmm, sure. if its noticeable at all, it may be in the chat at the beginning of round 2.
you know, demo's can be a strange animal sometimes. the first night i watched that particular tic from grains personal demo, i could actually see the combines full body with the cooked nade come into view just as grain shot. i watched, listened and replayed that a half dozen times or more.
the next night i watched it with r_drawothermodels 2, and the combine model never makes it into the final kill view. even after changing back to r_drawothermodels 1, the combine never entered grains view... it was a blind shot.
Zman42
2009-07-20 02:49:37
Mr. Grain
2009-07-20 02:53:28
Poor_Billy
2009-07-20 03:01:52
Sacrifist
2009-07-20 03:09:25
Paradox
2009-07-20 07:43:12
badinfluence
2009-07-20 10:36:55
ninojman
2009-07-20 17:09:33
Zman42 wrote:Weeeellllllllllllllllllllllll it's interesting you chose to delete my last thread, kinda seems like a shifty thing for an admin to do, whoever did it. if you are trying to just make me quietly go away and drop the dispute, then fine, you guys can play the game with grain, and continue letting him hack in any match he chooses because hey its grain and he was cleared right? right? riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. Gl with OGL nino, I'm sure you'll be just as bad an admin as you were in this league and in cal.
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2009-07-20 17:53:32
Paradox
2009-07-20 19:05:02
Uncle Rico
2009-07-20 19:13:44
badinfluence wrote:FFS.
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2009-07-20 19:26:38
Paradox
2009-07-20 19:38:31
Nutri-Grain
2009-07-20 23:31:51
L2k
2009-07-21 00:38:53
I think they should be black balled completely, not allowed to play at all even with a new account.Paradox wrote:Personally I don't think anyone with a vac ban on their account should be allowed to play, period. They should be forced to get a new, clean account.
Blasphemy
2009-07-21 00:56:56
tsktsk.plenty of ineffective spam
Nutri-Grain
2009-07-21 01:07:39
Paradox
2009-07-21 02:15:02
L2k wrote:I think they should be black balled completely, not allowed to play at all even with a new account.Paradox wrote:Personally I don't think anyone with a vac ban on their account should be allowed to play, period. They should be forced to get a new, clean account.
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2009-07-21 03:13:39
thats fine, let them get a new account, oh i was refering to ppl that have been vac banned and have new accounts anyway, and then submit demos until they have passed a certain time period. all the demos dont have to be reviewed, maybe just random picks or if somebody files a dispute. and this quote...."The problem with that L2K is how much of the community wouldnt be able to play? " i like you a lot para, and have a lot of respect for you, but that is just so rediculas i cant believe you said it. so ppl who have been caught cheating can play because we need to fill spots?Paradox wrote:L2k wrote:I think they should be black balled completely, not allowed to play at all even with a new account.Paradox wrote:Personally I don't think anyone with a vac ban on their account should be allowed to play, period. They should be forced to get a new, clean account.
The problem with that L2K is how much of the community wouldnt be able to play? We could barely get enough teams for some divisions as it was. I can think of at least 10 that wouldnt be able to play. That could reduce it to the point of non-functionalism. If they haxed in another game and they get a clean account, I see no reason they cant be given another shot. People do grow up and learn from their mistakes.
Paradox
2009-07-21 04:55:06
Sacrifist
2009-07-21 22:48:28
Blasphemy
2009-07-21 23:59:06
Sacrifist
2009-07-22 06:07:28
Or maybe more people would step up and play if they knew all the cheaters were unable to play....Neverknow, can swing both ways.Blasphemy wrote:this game is too small to exclude people. even if they have been caught cheating.
Panic
2009-07-22 06:46:21
Blasphemy
2009-07-22 06:51:19
i am guessing the people who would "step up" wouldn't even be worth playing.Sacrifist wrote:Or maybe more people would step up and play if they knew all the cheaters were unable to play....Neverknow, can swing both ways.Blasphemy wrote:this game is too small to exclude people. even if they have been caught cheating.
Panic
2009-07-22 09:03:33
badinfluence
2009-07-22 11:33:51
Uncle Rico wrote:badinfluence wrote:FFS.
Nutri-Grain
2009-07-23 00:27:27
badinfluence
2009-07-23 02:26:06
I have a new apprentice. You guys better watch out!Nutri-Grain wrote:In other news, I'd like to thank Bad Influence for making me the hacker that I am today Countless hours spent 1v1ing and getting my ass raped paid off!
Also, I'd just like to say that BI's training methods are unlike anyone else's. He never told me what to do; he just kept owning me and telling me to do what he did.
Sacrifist
2009-07-23 03:13:48
Since when is playing hackers worth playing?Blasphemy wrote:i am guessing the people who would "step up" wouldn't even be worth playing.Sacrifist wrote:Or maybe more people would step up and play if they knew all the cheaters were unable to play....Neverknow, can swing both ways.Blasphemy wrote:this game is too small to exclude people. even if they have been caught cheating.
Paradox
2009-07-23 03:27:09
Zman42
2009-07-23 03:34:52
-_- thats why its called a wallhack, instead of brightskins.Paradox wrote:Well getting back to the whole hacking accusation - round 2
I came across a couple of things on the Valve Developers Community Page and it made me wonder if in fact it is really possible for someone to use one of these hacks on a VAC, Pure 2 server. The reason I ask this is on the following links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valve_Anti-Cheat
http://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki ... Anti-Cheat
http://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Pure_Servers
Vac isnt effective against Wall hax, but Pure 2 wont allow the client (player) to modify or run different textures and models that would make a wall hax possible.
Paradox
2009-07-23 05:05:02
Without pure servers, clients could modify their materials, sounds, and models to give them advantages in the game. They might allow themselves to see through walls, make enemy models larger or brighter, or make certain sounds louder, thus giving them an advantage while playing.
Panic
2009-07-23 05:21:35
Paradox
2009-07-23 05:42:43
Nutri-Grain
2009-07-23 06:50:06
lolufrustrated?Zman42 wrote:-_- thats why its called a wallhack, instead of brightskins.Paradox wrote:Well getting back to the whole hacking accusation - round 2
I came across a couple of things on the Valve Developers Community Page and it made me wonder if in fact it is really possible for someone to use one of these hacks on a VAC, Pure 2 server. The reason I ask this is on the following links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valve_Anti-Cheat
http://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki ... Anti-Cheat
http://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Pure_Servers
Vac isnt effective against Wall hax, but Pure 2 wont allow the client (player) to modify or run different textures and models that would make a wall hax possible.
Blasphemy
2009-07-23 07:17:43
i always thought its better to play someone that's hacking than somoeone who is shitty at the game. at the end of the day i am going to improve playing the hacker, but since I've pretty much lost and beaten any one worth playing and don't think they hack it doesn't really aplly.Sacrifist wrote:Since when is playing hackers worth playing?Blasphemy wrote:i am guessing the people who would "step up" wouldn't even be worth playing.Sacrifist wrote: Or maybe more people would step up and play if they knew all the cheaters were unable to play....Neverknow, can swing both ways.
Blasphemy
2009-07-23 07:23:57
Uncle Rico
2009-07-23 07:27:20
Right, Pure 2 disallows all custom sounds, textures, and models. Your xhair and hud are the only things that I know of that you can change. It's just like Holy's hi res pack and the Rick Roll rpg sounds (which I sincerely miss using btw and can't find them). Replacing wall textures with see through textures won't work with Pure 2. Even if someone did use clear textures on Pure 0 servers, they would have to have a set for every map since most maps use different textures for different things. Anything else that would allow you to know positions on a Pure 2 server would be monkeying with code and that gets you the mighty hammer of VAC.Paradox wrote:Apparently, according to the Pure Server website, Pure 2 takes care of wall hax. I only know what they do not exactly how they work in terms of monkeying with the game code to allow it.
Without pure servers, clients could modify their materials, sounds, and models to give them advantages in the game. They might allow themselves to see through walls, make enemy models larger or brighter, or make certain sounds louder, thus giving them an advantage while playing.
Uncle Rico
2009-07-23 07:32:19
Even those eventually get VAC'd. The people running those sites can shut down and walk away with a fat pocket while some 14 yr old virtual tard sits in his room and cries. He's not getting his money back, and he's not getting his account back either.Blasphemy wrote:the only hacks worth having, no one would shell out for a free game let alone a dead one.
phantom
2009-07-23 18:39:05
i used to have this glitch with my old graphics card was pretty fun messing with pplPanic wrote:Thats funny, cause my buddies computer is so crappy, his vid settings sometimes make it possible to see thru doorframes, or makes some small fences that could normally be used as cover not appear.
Walking Target
2009-07-23 19:41:32
ninjins
2009-07-24 00:54:40
Panic
2009-07-24 02:40:32
Sacrifist
2009-07-24 02:54:50
well said sirTiGGy wrote:I used to think grain hacked, then i played with ewr countless times...hes just a smart player. i used to think luke was bullshit too, just like seagull and luke thought i hacked a while ago to (as far as i know seagull still thought i hacked or messed around with them)
truth is, grain and billy play with confidence. they talk trash and put you down and people let it get to them over a video game. this is what causes people to lose. then when things start to look suspicious to zman and confused in the final match, they get frustrated and automatically assume that because things dont seem right, the opposing team is cheating. which is probably what happened here.
i got to the point where i played grain a few times and started laughing in his face when he couldnt hit me and i started getting more kills on him. after that i played with confidence even though i didnt give a shit whether or not i lost.. guess what happened? i beat him on tigcrik. theres now not much more you can do zman because they will always have that confidence reigning over you and they know they can get the best of you. sorry to say man but you kinda blew it a long time ago by taking it too seriously.
you're not always going to be the best. you're eventually gonna come across someone who has better reflexes, more precise aim and possibly more gaming experience than you.
call me a dick or whatever but its the truth, and the truth usually sucks.
{EE}chEmicalbuRn
2009-07-24 03:02:22
Walking Target wrote:Posting links to hack sites is not permitted here guys.
Va|iums
2009-07-24 08:51:01
Divinity
2009-07-24 10:43:36
graffitiknockout
2009-07-24 11:21:41
lol what? I didn't remove you, you must have removed me.Va|iums wrote:Sorry to bursts $W's bubble, looks I already did that because LukeGT is oversensitive and removed me from friends for ribbing on Confused for lying for the 4th time
when was the last time I accused someone of cheating? I just try to play and improve without saying much.Va|iums wrote:Now I know it's a fashion trend in the community lately to make accusations of hacking, *cough LukeGT, Zman, Divinity* and more I'll leave nameless for politeness, but I'm tired of you guys, specifically SW members accusing anyone who plays better then you of hacking.
cool story bro. glad to see that you want us to get better @_@. I believe that ninjins hit the nail on the head though. I feel that there is a persona that some people have that just makes you play worse, if you let it get to you. I think the next goal is to be unaffected by it. I suggest everyone take a stab at that one, might see some interesting improvementsVa|iums wrote:You guys are old talent, get over it, the new styles and the brain of a high IQ 15 year old are too much for you now
Va|iums
2009-07-24 21:20:15
Uncle Rico
2009-07-24 21:53:41
Walking Target
2009-07-25 19:33:11
Coz it's just the rules, okay? I don't make them...oh wait...yes I do.{EE}chEmicalBurn wrote:Walking Target wrote:Posting links to hack sites is not permitted here guys.
lmao. why? this is the HL2dm community forum. a community that has apperently accepted hacking and cheating as K, might as well post the links.